Tuesday, June 19, 2018

When the huddled masses are innocent children stuck inside a cage

[Click the highlighted links for source information.]

For several days I’ve been trying to gather enough thoughts to write about the travesty taking place along our southern border, but it’s hard for right-thinking individuals to grasp the magnitude of an administration policy that incarcerates young children without their parents in a country where they probably don’t speak the language and have no concept of what’s being done to them.

I don’t care what party you belong to or who you support politically or what you believe morally or philosophically, you would have to agree that this abhorrent practice is wrong. In fact, it is so far beyond wrong that I’m not sure there’s even a word for it yet. And if you somehow don’t agree that this is wrong, then I’d suggest you have your own children dragged off crying and screaming to the nearest dog kennel where they would be thrown into cages and left there indefinitely by guardians who aren’t allowed to touch them or hug them or comfort them in any way.

If that doesn’t make you see the light, then you’re not fit to share the same air that decent people breathe.

In case you arrived late, here are a few facts:

* In early February 2017, just days after President Trump took office, his administration began weighing what was called “the nuclear option” to discourage immigrants from unlawfully entering the country. Under the policy, according to The New York Times, “Children would be separated from their parents if the families had been apprehended entering the country illegally…in order to deter more movement along this terribly dangerous network.”

To emphasize, that happened during February into March 2017...more than 15 months before it caught the media’s attention.

“Advocates inside the administration, most prominently Stephen Miller, Mr. Trump’s senior policy adviser, never gave up on the idea,” The Times continued. “Last month, facing a sharp uptick in illegal border crossings, Mr. Trump ordered a new effort to criminally prosecute anyone who crossed the border unlawfully – with few exceptions for parents traveling with their minor children.”

Miller, the white supremacist neo-Nazi who is the chief policy adviser to our faux president, called it “a simple decision” to enforce a zero tolerance policy at the border, the message being that “no one is exempt from immigration law.”

A little background on Stephen Miller:

* The 2007 Duke University graduate began polishing his white supremacist ideals in college, where he wrote conservative columns for the school newspaper and became well-known for defending white Duke lacrosse players accused of raping a black exotic dancer – even before all of the facts of the case were known. The basis for his position was, apparently, that the players were white and the dancer was not and therefore they must be innocent.

* He once called Maya Angelou a “racial paranoid” and helped Richard Spencer, another Duke graduate, raise funds for an anti-immigration organization of which they were both members. Spencer would later become an important figure in the white supremacist movement and president of the National Policy Institute, and is famous for coining the term "alt-right."

* After college, Miller worked as a press secretary for nut-job Congresswoman Michele Bachmann of Minnesota and later for an Alabama senator and future attorney general named (wait for it)…Jeff Sessions, commandant of Trump’s (and Miller’s) new no tolerance border policy.

There’s more, but you can google him for the full story.

Back to the policy, this immoral practice of separating children from parents had been going on for a few weeks when images started to appear of a small child crying while her mother was frisked and, later, children housed in chain-link cages inside an abandoned Texas Walmart. Asked about the policy, Trump originally blamed the Democrats and said, like everything else wrong with this country, it must have been Obama’s fault.

Subsequently, Press Secretary Sarah the Prevaricator Sanders first denied that the zero tolerance dictum was a new policy and claimed it was existing law. Then, both she and AG Sessions quoted the Bible to justify the enforcement of a law that actually doesn’t exist.  

But wait! A day or so later, a spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security admitted that 1,995 minors were separated from their families at the southern border between April 19 and the end of May of this year under the administration's “relatively new zero tolerance policy.” This is the same new policy that the White House had openly denied.

Next, DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen walked back the comment on June 17, saying, “We do not have a policy of separating families at the border. Period.” That was a apparently a lie, because a day later she defended the practice and claimed that the children who had been separated from their families were being well cared for, although she admitted she didn’t know where they are.

So to recap: One day we “do not separate families at the border” and a day later the children who have been separated from their parents “are being well cared for.” This all prompted no less than William Kristol, the very conservative political analyst and editor-at-large of The Weekly Standard, to tweet:

Trump: The Democrats made us do it.
Stephen Miller: It's our policy to do it.
Sec. Nielsen: We're not doing it.

Or, as I'd put it, for an administration that lies about everything all of the time, these people really aren't very good at it.

Now, Trump says it’s up to Congress to fix the problem and the Democrats are “obstructing” that effort, but ask yourself this: How hard would it be for Trump to pick up a phone, call House Speaker Paul Ryan and Senate President Mitch McConnell and tell them to get this done. In case you’ve been in a coma for a few years, you know that the Republicans control both houses of Congress, so getting this problem fixed should be one of the easiest things Trump has ever done.

Instead, he’d rather tweet nonsense and whine about Democrats and Obama and anything else that crosses his mind except for a real solution to a very serious issue.

In conclusion, I still can’t fully grasp the magnitude of what the United States of America is doing to innocent children, most of whom came here with their parents to escape deplorable conditions in their home countries and to seek safety in the country that is guarded by the Statue of Liberty. They are the very definition of the people described on the base of Lady Liberty -- the tired, the poor, the huddled masses yearning to breathe free.

It boggles the mind the way they are being treated, and it makes me want to cry.

This much I know. Until recently, I believed that of all the evil things Donald Trump has done, the one that should have automatically disqualified him to be president was his mocking of a disabled reporter who was on the campaign trail doing his job. Now, I’m convinced that that episode -- disgusting as it was -- comes in a distant second to the government-sanctioned child abuse taking place under Trump’s watch in Texas and other border states.

This not only disqualifies Trump as our president, in my mind, but as a human being as well. Anyone who continues to support him and, god forbid, votes for him again should be rocketed into space with no return vehicle or set adrift without food or water on a raft in the middle of the ocean.

I also hope that with this national disgrace hanging from their necks, Republicans in Congress will soon find themselves without a job while sanity returns to America. As I always say, elections have consequences.

No comments:

Post a Comment