The fact that they continue to occur with such alarming
frequency proves once again that the sight of crumpled, bloodied and bullet-riddled
bodies of six- and seven-year-old children and their teachers at Sandy Hook
Elementary School wasn’t powerful enough to overcome the tug and pull of our
country’s well-financed gun lobby.
More than five years later, we continue to argue that if the
atrocity at Sandy Hook didn’t bring about a change in our gun laws then nothing
ever will, while acknowledging both that it didn’t and that it won’t.
Something is seriously wrong in this country and everybody
knows it, including, I believe, the lawmakers who take millions of dollars from
the NRA and give back nothing more than their thoughts and prayers whenever another
innocent child – or maybe 17 of them – die inside a school. Oh, they know,
alright. How could any of them not know? But still they do nothing but blame it
all on mental health while they accept the checks from the gun people, shake
hands and smile and say “thanks.”
By now you’ve no doubt seen the list of legislators who
receive the largest gun lobby contributions, and you may also have seen video
clips of them offering condolences and prayers for the families of dead children.
There’s nothing meaningful that I can add to those images that absolutely speak
for themselves.
There are, however, a couple of things I can add to the debate.
First, I’m sure you’ve been hearing that there have been 18
school shootings so far this year. The organization dispensing that information
is a non-profit foundation known as “Everytown for Gun Safety,” founded in 2014
to advocate in favor of stricter gun control and to rail against gun violence.
They send me text messages frequently urging me to take some action against
guns.
While their hearts may be in the right place, their statistics
are significantly skewed. There have not
been 18 school shootings this year if you consider a school shooting to involve
gun violence during school hours that results in injury or death. On the contrary,
The Guardian web site reports just
eight such shootings so far this year, and The
Washington Post goes even further:
“Just
five of Everytown’s 18 school shootings listed for 2018 happened during school
hours and resulted in any physical injury. Three others appeared to be
intentional shootings but did not hurt anyone. Two more involved guns – one carried
by a school police officer and the other by a licensed peace officer who ran a
college club – that were unintentionally fired and, again, led to no injuries.
At least seven of Everytown’s 18 shootings took place outside normal school
hours.”
So that leaves five school shootings in just 46 days of
2018. That’s one every 9.2 days – still far too many – but also far from the 18
we’re supposed to believe. This kind of statistical manipulation to prove a
point is exactly what the Left accuses the Right of doing. One could rightfully
call it “fake news,” and it doesn’t help Everytown’s credibility while trying
to make a case for better gun laws. They may be on the side of the angels, but
they need to be better than that.
My second point is even more troubling. I read that the 19-year-old
Florida shooter bought his AR-15 legally because he was over the age of 18, but
under federal law he would have needed to be 21 to buy a handgun. Are you
serious? He couldn’t legally buy a revolver that would have shot six to 12 bullets
at a time but was cleared to buy an assault rifle that enabled him to fire off more
than 100 rounds in six minutes?
I’m not a gun guy, so could someone tell me the logic in
this? Who thought this was a good idea? Why does any person under the age of 21
who is not in the military need a military-style assault rifle and the large-capacity
clips that go with them? Please, tell me…I really want to know.
For eight years during the Obama presidency gun sales
skyrocketed because gun-rights advocates were sure the government was coming
for their guns. In reality, no one ever intended to do that…and no one ever did.
Clearly, no one intends to do that now under President Bone Spur, so given that
everybody gets to keep their weapons, at least for now, can’t we all agree that
raising the age to buy an AR-15 makes sense? Shouldn’t it be at least as hard
as buying a target pistol, if not harder?
Gun lobby or no gun lobby, is this really too much to ask?
No comments:
Post a Comment